|
Canadian Dental Research Institute
Canadian Dental Research Institute
 |
|
|
|
Here are links to some of our favourite
websites...
www.prosthodontics.ca
Milled Bars for Implant-supported Prostheses/
Barres usinés pour prothèses implanto-portées
N.Tardif, H. Gaucher
Canadian Journal of Restorative Dentistry and
Prosthodontics/Journaldentisterie restauratrice et de
prosthodontie,
Vol.
3-2 , p. 30-9 Spring/printemps 2010
_____________________________________________
The Effects of Different Surface Treatments on
the Bond Strenght of Two Esthetic Post Systems
B. Akkayan, B. Sahin, H.
Gaucher
Canadian Journal of Restoratice Dentistry and
Prosthodontics, Vol 2-3, p.22-29 Summer 2009
__________________________________________________________
Useful Information
The CDRI is sponsoring a lecture tour in Turkey in the Spring
of 2008 on the topic of "Non Invasive Restorative Procedures". |
- Influence of
ceramic thickness and polymerization mode of a resin luting agent
on early bond strength and durability with a lithium
disilicate–based ceramic system
Akgungor G, Akkayan B, Gaucher H
pages 234-24
Abstract
| Full
Text | PDF
(222 KB)
Journal of Prosthetic
Dentistry; September 2005
(Vol
94, Issue 3)
__________________________________________________________________
A Multi-Centre Study of
Osseotite Implants Supporting Mandibular Restorations:
A 3-Year Report
• Hubert Gaucher, DDS, MScD •
• Kenneth Bentley, MD, DDS •
• Serge Roy, DMD, MScD •
• Timothy Head, DDS, FRCD(C) •
• John Blomfield, DDS, MScD, FRCD(C) •
• François Blondeau, DMD, FRCD(C) •
• Lynda Nicholson, DMD, MSc •
• Antoine Chehade, DDS, M.Sc., FRCD(C)
•
• Normand Tardif, DDS, MScD •
• Richard Emery, DDS, FRCD(C) •
Abstract
This multi-centre study evaluated the performance of the
Osseotite implant in the mandibular arch. Osseotite implants (n =
688) were placed in 172 patients; 43.5% were placed in the anterior
mandible and 66.5% in the posterior mandible. Fifteen per cent of
the implants were placed in soft bone, 56.9% in normal bone and
28.1% in dense bone. During placement, 49.9% of the implants were
identified as having a tight fit, 48.6% a firm fit and 1.5% a loose
fit. About one-third of the implants (32.4%) were short (10 mm in
length or less). After 36 months, only 5 implants had been lost,
for a cumulative survival rate of 99.3%. The 3-year results of this
study indicate a high degree of predictability with placement of
Osseotite implants in the mandibular arch.
MeSH Key Words: dental implantation, endosseous/methods; dental implants;
dental prosthesis design; mandible
|
© J
Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67(9):528-33
This article has been peer reviewed. |
|
|
|